Friday, October 8, 2010

Leftist Psychology: Delusions In Disguise


                                         By Michael Parish



  I've blogged on here before about the psychological inadequacies plaguing the modern Left, but I've never systematically analyzed them and presented a full conclusion. So, to cop a line from Lenny Bruce, I, as a "surgeon with a scalpal for false values" will dedicate this blog post to doing just that. So kick back, relax, and crack a beer as I shine a flashlight through the mothballed corridors of liberal consciousness...


  The liberal mind cognizes deductively, albeit having internalized its own strawman reasoning. Expressed abstractly it goes something like this-

1.Policy A is intended to advance the interests of group B.
2.Person C opposes Policy A.
3.Therefore, Person C opposes the societal advancement of group B.
4. Person C is therefore an "ist" or "phobe" regarding group B.

 This line of thinking is applied to all objects of discourse.Opposing-

1. Affirmative action = "racist"
2. Abortion = "sexist"
3. Gay marriage and/or adoption =  "homophobe"
4. Mass immigration = "xenophobe."

 These are then added together and deduced to the following equation-

1. Conservative and/or non-left thought opposes affirmative action, abortion, gay marriage and adoption, and mass immigration.
2. Affirmative action, abortion, gay marriage and adoption, and mass immigration are neccessary for the societal advancement of their corresponding groups.
3. Therefore, conservatives and non-leftists oppose the societal advancement of those groups.
4. Therefore, conservativism and non-leftism are not ideologies but discursive covers for straight white males seeking to mantain their own supposed privelege while suppressing others.

 This serves a dual function for the leftism, which likewise is deduced from a starting point-

1. Conservative and non-leftist views are not an actual ideology but covers for bigotry.
2. Therefore, the leftist is exempt from having to engage in actual debate with conservatives and non-leftist.

 And-

1. Conservative and non-leftist arguments against liberal positions are actually arguments in favor of restoring past bigotries and inequalities.
2. Therefore, the leftist's positions are exempt from conservative and non-leftist criticism.

 From this reductionist deflation of conservative claims is deducted the leftist's own self-image-

1. Conservatives are societal deviants seeking to perpetuate bigotry and inequality.
2. Leftists oppose conservatives and their agenda.
3. Therefore, leftists are societal heros fighting against societal deviants and their bigotry and inequality.

  And from this we derive the leftist conception of the socio-political realm-

 1. All politics is a good versus evil struggle between left-wing heros and right-wing villains.
 2. As the heroes, the Left and its policies are exempt from criticism and need not engage in actual debate.
 3. As the villains, the Right and its policies deserve nothing but criticism and need not be actually debated.

 
   It becomes obvious, then, that-


   1. The modern Leftist adheres to a false paradigm constructed through the use of deductive   logic that starts with false premises and ignores all actual facts and information.
   2. Adhering to a false paradigm constructed using this method is a delusion.
   3. Therefore, modern Leftism is not a real ideology but a delusion, or mental illness.


   It's plain to be seen who the truly irrational, unreasoned, and bigoted folks are in this place. 




 
  

4 comments:

  1. I agree with you 100%

    Fuck Liberal Lunatics!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lenny Bruce was imprisoned by a right-wing judicial system where he committed suicide for challenging racism in his 60's stand-up. Funny that you quote him, and know nothing about him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's their M.O.

    The logical fallacy you outline is referred to as as 'Denying the Antecedent.'

    Here is a sample of the logic taken as example from the 1850's from the work of Frederic Bastiat:

    "Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain."
    — Frédéric Bastiat

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://www.derailingfordummies.com/

    http://www.metafilter.com/74157/An-Anthology-of-Privilege-Checklists

    Its really getting this bad.

    ReplyDelete