
by Quagmire
The now unavoidable dogma of "tolerance" and "sensitivity" is, when stripped of the utopian and idealist visions it is intended to provoke, a form of cultural regression. In the same way consumerism reduces what would otherwise be functioning adults to the the intellectual status of children, political correctness reduces these same hapless victims to the same low status emotionally. What would in cultures untained by this contagion be accepted as inevitable and dismissed as non-events in the "tolerant" culture becomes elevated to the level of a natural disaster or similar catastrophe. The heavy-hand of the law is summoned as the only remedy where that law is uneeded and where its prescence is undesirable. Case in point:
Police: Boy, 16, made racial comment a N.J. Wal-Mart
A 16-yr old boy, someone fairly low on our societal food chain, made a "racial comment" at a New Jersey Wal Mart, someplace farily low on our societal food chain-and the police get involved? Is there not legitamate criminal behavior occuring in the area for them to be involved with?
WASHINTON TOWNSHIP, N.J.-A 16 yr old boy who police said made an announcement at Wal-Mart ordering all black people in the southern New Jersey store to leave was charged with intimidation and bias harrassment, authorities said Saturday.
Blacks have already successfully survived slavery and Jim Crow, I highly doubt they would feel "intimidated" and "harrassed" by a scrawny, crater-faced adolescent yowling through an intercom. Notice how he is being "charged" with hurting people's feelings the same way one would be charged with hurting someone's body. Any nation that considers emtional and physical wounds to be morally equivalent is a nation of infants.
The boy, whose name is not being released because he is a juvenile, grabbed one of the courtesy phones at Walmart's Washington Township Square sunday evening and calmly announced: "Attention, Walmart customers: All black people, leave the store now" police said.
This sounds more like a juvenile prank than anything else. A prank in poor taste, but a prank nonetheless. May I point out that certain individuals possess an innate tendency to embrace cultural taboos, and that the hypermoralism of political correctness grants these things a humorous appeal they would not otherwise have?
The teen was arrested friday and released to the custody of his parents; police did not know whether he had a lawyer.
So the police actually spent a full workweek tracking this idiot down and arresting him...five days after the fact? And if he was immediately released into his parent's custody, what was the point of arresting him in the first place? Ooooh now he needs a lawyer to defend him because he said bad wowds that huwt peopw's pweshus feewings. Again, only in a nation of infants.
"This was an extremely disturbing event on many levels" Glouchester County Prosecutor Sean Dalton said at a news conference. "Any statements like these that can cause harm or great concern must be addressed as quickly as we possibly can."
Some teenager pulling a dumb prank-and it was a dumb prank-is "an extremely disturbing event on many levels." Any juvenile antics like these that can cause crying and bedwetting in a community of pussified liberals must be laughed at as loudly as we possibly can.
Dalton said the case would be handled in juvenile court in neighboring Atlantic County, where the boy lives. He would not say whether the boy has a criminal record, citing the teen's age, and would not disclose the teen's race, saying that did not factor into the equation.
Ooh now the New Jersey taxpayer is getting bilked to pay for it, and lawyers and judges are being sapped of their valuable time to handle it. Are there not legitimate cases these resources could be allocated to? Given the dystepic situation of young people in our decaying world, i'm sure the juvenile court system has plenty.
Authorities would not say if the announcement was planned or had been made impulsively. Police said they were also investigating a teenage boy who had accompanied the suspect to the store, but the other boy has not been charged.
Again, they're talking about this as if it was a legitimate crime. Were the huwtfuw comments unplanned or premeditated? And how exactly are they "investigating" his buddy? Are they going to question him with things like "Did you help him come up with this idea?" or, better yet "Is he working for you?". And if he does end up geeting charged, what will those charges be?" Accomplice to first degree insult"?
Officials for Bentonville, Ark.-based Wal-Mart Stores inc. said the announcement was "unacceptable", and Dalton praised the company for its strong cooperation in the investigation.
Damn, I can't think of a smartass comment to throw in here. So we move on...
"We're pleased this matter is resolved" Wal-Mart spokesperson Dave Tovar said in a statement issued after the news conference. We have updated our intercom system at this store to prevent this from ever happening again. We again apologize to all of our customers and associates who had to listen to something so offensive."
Well, I'm glad they're taking that first step to recovery. Perhaps Hillary Clinton can now show up and "help the healing begin." Dave, man, your customers and associates aren't entitled to an apology. Everyone at some point has to listen to something offensive-it's a law of nature and inevitable fact of life. Instead of apologizing, you should educate them on the emotional benefits of growing a pair of balls and getting the fuck over it.
Although a manager quickly went to the intercom and apologized for the remark, many customers expressed their anger to store management. Some community members said Saturday that they've heard reports of similar incidents happening that were not reported to the police.
I'm sure he did, and I'm sure they did. The reason those incidents were not reported to the police was because it's not their job to take care of everything that is offensive to you. I have no idea precisely what type of community this is, but its members seem to have an entitlement mentality.
"We are concerned about that, and we're looking into these incidents. We want to work with the community to make sure these types of incidents don't happen," said Loretta Winters, president of the Gloucester County chapter of the NAACP.
And how exactly is that to be accomplished? With surveillance cameras and voice recorders posted everywhere? With Tolerance Police patrolling the streets? I'm onto you fucks.
Winters said she hopes the boy will get counseling and be educated about sensitivity so he can understand the consequences of his actions.
Read: She will demand that the boy be coerced into attending a mandatory sensitivity training course where he will be stripped of his individuality and he reporgrammed as another mindless drone within the hive of the multicult. Personally, I hope someone introduces him to Tom Sunic so he'll understand why he is right and they are wrong.
"I'm assuming this person didn't realize how hurtful his comments were" she said.
Again with the infantile bellyaching about hurt feelings. Let me make this crystal clear: nothing in the united states constitution gives you a right not to have your feelings hurt, no matter how hard you want to believe otherwise.
The incident is the latest in a series of problems the retailer has had in its dealings with minorities and women.
Oh, I bet.
There have been several past instances of black customers claiming they were treated unfairly at Wal Mart stores, and the company faced lawsuits that women were passed over in favor of men for pay raises and promotions.
If you're shopping at Wal-Mart, then life is treating you unfairly in the first place. Yes, and if man were passed over in favor of women for those advancements it would be positive discrimination, a neccessary step in the struggle for social justice.
In February 2009, the retailer paid $17.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging racial discrimination in the hiring of truck drivers.
Ooh I wanted a job and you didn't give me it so now you owe me money.
And the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the company in May 2009, claiming some Hispanic employees at a Sam's Club subsidiary in California were subjected to a hostile work envieronment. That suit alleges managers failed to stop repeated verbal harrassment, including the use of derogatory words, against employees of Mexican descent.
The purpose of this dreadful buraucracy is to ensure you have equal opportunity, not to protect your precious little ears once that opportunity arrives. Perhaps those Mexicans should have stood up for themselves and told their harrasser's to fuck off, which I would respect far more than trying to enlist their bosses to fight their battles for them. This is the adult world equivalent of tugging on mommy's dress and pointing to the kid who called you a bad name. Well, when you get to a certain age mommy is going to stop caring, and you're well past that age.
However, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has said the company has worked hard in recent years to show it cares about diversity.
Diversity=a broad range of skin colors, genders, sexual orientations, and other superficialities, all processed through the same social engineering mechanisms and subordinated to the same secular theocracy.
Dear reader, this bullshit can only last a limited period of time before it self-destructs. Upon that glorious day, we can dance the tango on its charred remains.
想像是什麼並不重要,想像能做什麼才重要........................................
ReplyDelete